<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>IvyLees - Latest Comments in Having a code of ethics, in and of itself, is meaningless</title><link>http://ivylees.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://ivylees.disqus.com/having_a_code_of_ethics_in_and_of_itself_is_meaningless/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 10:37:17 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Having a code of ethics, in and of itself, is meaningless</title><link>http://blog.ivylees.com/having-a-code-of-ethics-in-and-of-itself-is-meaningless/#comment-13781800</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Rex:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here's hoping your kitten  inventory is low. How about sacrificing interns instead?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bob&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobdavis</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 10:37:17 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>